| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
| Date: | 2023-04-07 01:59:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+pHE-BSNpMpAD2sP-dbGL5UdEWbNgmfqdX4qk_HcgGgQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 6:55 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-06 12:10:57 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > After this, I think for backends that have active slots, it would
> > simply cancel the current query. Will that be sufficient? Because we
> > want the backend process should exit and release the slot so that the
> > startup process can mark it invalid.
>
> We don't need them to exit, we just need them to release the slot. Which does
> happen when the query is cancelled. Imagine if that weren't the case - if a
> cancellation of pg_logical_slot_* wouldn't release the slot, we couldn't call
> it again before disconnecting. I also did verify that indeed the slot is
> released upon a cancellation.
>
makes sense. Thanks for the clarification!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-07 02:09:50 | Re: zstd compression for pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-04-07 01:59:39 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |