Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-04-27 02:44:34
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+p+J0GaJ=4UV5N+-R3jiFJH+5m8OU5k9VAoRsMv-U5zQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:05:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > I think the above commit needs a separate mention, as this is a really
>> > huge step forward to control the size of hash indexes.
>>
>> Yes, it is unfotunate that the item is in the incompatibility item. I
>> wonder if I should split out the need to rebuild the hash indexes and
>> keep it there and move this item into the "Index" section.
>
> Done, items split.
>

<listitem>
<!--
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-02-27 [b0f18cb77] hash: Refactor bucket squeeze code.
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-02-27 [30df93f69] hash: Refactor overflow page allocation.
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-04-03 [ea69a0dea] Expand hash indexes more gradually.
-->
<para>
Improve efficiency of hash index growth (Amit Kapila, Mithun Cy)
</para>
</listitem>

The first two commits b0f18cb77, 30df93f69 are done as preliminary
work to "Add write-ahead logging support to hash indexes", so it seems
inappropriate to add them here. We can add it along with below item:

<!--
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-03-14 [c11453ce0] hash: Add write-ahead logging support.
-->
<para>
Add write-ahead logging support to hash indexes (Amit Kapila)
</para>

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-04-27 02:48:32 Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-27 02:32:03 Re: vcregress support for single TAP tests