From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 10 release notes |
Date: | 2017-04-27 02:44:34 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+p+J0GaJ=4UV5N+-R3jiFJH+5m8OU5k9VAoRsMv-U5zQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:05:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > I think the above commit needs a separate mention, as this is a really
>> > huge step forward to control the size of hash indexes.
>>
>> Yes, it is unfotunate that the item is in the incompatibility item. I
>> wonder if I should split out the need to rebuild the hash indexes and
>> keep it there and move this item into the "Index" section.
>
> Done, items split.
>
<listitem>
<!--
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-02-27 [b0f18cb77] hash: Refactor bucket squeeze code.
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-02-27 [30df93f69] hash: Refactor overflow page allocation.
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-04-03 [ea69a0dea] Expand hash indexes more gradually.
-->
<para>
Improve efficiency of hash index growth (Amit Kapila, Mithun Cy)
</para>
</listitem>
The first two commits b0f18cb77, 30df93f69 are done as preliminary
work to "Add write-ahead logging support to hash indexes", so it seems
inappropriate to add them here. We can add it along with below item:
<!--
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2017-03-14 [c11453ce0] hash: Add write-ahead logging support.
-->
<para>
Add write-ahead logging support to hash indexes (Amit Kapila)
</para>
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-04-27 02:48:32 | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-27 02:32:03 | Re: vcregress support for single TAP tests |