Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Date: 2022-07-30 06:55:01
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+YNrtPt=vPfZ1_1x6NvK-dNcs8avUf+R0Y-XqFZfGFpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:08 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've attached updated patches that incorporated the above comments as
> well as the comment from Amit.
>
> BTW regarding 0001 patch to remove the duplicated wait, should we
> backpatch to v15?
>

I think it is good to clean this test case even for PG15 even though
there is no major harm in keeping it. I'll push this early next week
by Tuesday unless someone thinks otherwise.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-30 07:14:33 Re: Collect ObjectAddress for ATTACH DETACH PARTITION to use in event trigger
Previous Message mahendrakar s 2022-07-30 06:53:47 Re: A proposal for shared memory based backup infrastructure