Re: sidewinder has one failure

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 8:00 AM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 06:56:48AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > In the latter case, we either want to
> > (a) tweak the test to raise the value of max_files_per_process, (b)
> > remove the test entirely.
>
> I generally favor keeping the test, but feel free to decide it's too hard.
>

I am thinking that for now, we should raise the limit of
max_files_per_process in the test to something like 35 or 40, so that
sidewinder passes and unblocks other people who might get blocked due
to this, for example, I think one case is reported here
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200106105608.GB18560%40msg.df7cb.de,
see Ubuntu bionic ..). I feel with this still we shall be able to
catch the problem we are facing on 'tern' and 'mandrill'.

Do you have any opinion on this?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com