Re: sidewinder has one failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sidewinder has one failure
Date: 2020-01-08 13:17:04
Message-ID: 17762.1578489424@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am thinking that for now, we should raise the limit of
> max_files_per_process in the test to something like 35 or 40, so that
> sidewinder passes and unblocks other people who might get blocked due
> to this

That will not fix the problem for FD-per-semaphore platforms.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-01-08 13:19:41 Re: parallel vacuum options/syntax
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-01-08 13:16:38 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum