| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |
| Date: | 2018-08-13 05:03:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+TLqN+YJCLzef2pB3SAn9SqS36XjEaGhi5E02O4P3iHA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have noticed that part of the comment atop ExecShutdownNode is now
>> redundant. See attached edit_comments_shutdown_node_v1, let me know
>> if you think otherwise.
>
> Oh, yes, that should be adjusted.
>
Pushed the patch for same.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-08-13 05:05:10 | Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-08-13 03:52:20 | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |