Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans
Date: 2018-08-03 13:26:47
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYf81A9_ZZhWwDdfW9D746K0TNtAbALXkJApBk1xGRXig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have noticed that part of the comment atop ExecShutdownNode is now
> redundant. See attached edit_comments_shutdown_node_v1, let me know
> if you think otherwise.

Oh, yes, that should be adjusted.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-08-03 13:28:08 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-08-03 13:25:50 Re: FailedAssertion on partprune