Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Date: 2019-05-07 03:10:36
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+Sn7PnW4U0Xc9aK6o4xRgFfQP9-vXuWeMGz-MEXQ5tSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2019-05-05 18:55:30 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> I understand that we have to take a call here shortly, but as there is
> >> a weekend so I would like to wait for another day to see if anyone
> >> else wants to share his opinion.
>
> > I still think that's the right course. I've previously stated that, so
> > I'm probably not fulfilling the "anyone else" criterion though.
>
> I also prefer "revert and try again in v13", but I'm not "anyone else"
> either ...
>

Fine, I will take care of that today.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-05-07 03:15:11 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-07 03:09:14 Re: [HACKERS] Broken O(n^2) avoidance in wal segment recycling.