Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Date: 2019-05-06 15:03:54
Message-ID: 14049.1557155034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-05-05 18:55:30 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I understand that we have to take a call here shortly, but as there is
>> a weekend so I would like to wait for another day to see if anyone
>> else wants to share his opinion.

> I still think that's the right course. I've previously stated that, so
> I'm probably not fulfilling the "anyone else" criterion though.

I also prefer "revert and try again in v13", but I'm not "anyone else"
either ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-05-06 15:10:15 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Previous Message Oleksii Kliukin 2019-05-06 15:02:09 Re: Per-tablespace autovacuum settings