Re: automatically generating node support functions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date: 2022-08-09 13:16:34
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+Os--6YnT-bLg7djPCh16ymASWNWYhFFW+PE7+mzc1WA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Ah. It'd help if that complaint said what the command input actually
> > is :-(. But on looking closer, I missed stripping the empty strings
> > that "split" will produce at the ends of the array. I think the
> > attached will do the trick, and I really do want to get rid of this
> > copy of the file list if possible.
>
> I tried this version on the cfbot, and it seems happy, so pushed.
>

Thank you. I have verified the committed patch and it works.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2022-08-09 13:59:51 Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-09 13:13:21 Re: Materialized view rewrite is broken when there is an event trigger