Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date: 2020-09-15 02:58:38
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+Me4ufX-TMBZNBf+Dw6p6T361mGOVV_WfDf=BxNdbq1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
> > back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.
>
> The fix seems sensible to me.
>

Thanks, I think it is better to wait for a day or two as yesterday
only we stamped 13 and we need to backpatch this.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-09-15 03:03:34 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-15 02:56:24 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()