Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date: 2020-09-15 03:24:55
Message-ID: 1235768.1600140295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> The fix seems sensible to me.

> Thanks, I think it is better to wait for a day or two as yesterday
> only we stamped 13 and we need to backpatch this.

Right, please avoid pushing anything non-critical to REL_13_STABLE
until you see the git tag appear. I doubt we will need to re-wrap
the tarballs, but you never know.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 03:34:44 Re: Gripes about walsender command processing
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-15 03:22:15 Re: Gripes about walsender command processing