Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up

On Sun, Nov 8, 2026 at 9:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 02:47:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > + Avoid resetting a replication
> > + subscription's <literal>two_phase</literal> state to pending if it
> > + is already enabled (Zhijie Hou)
>
> > We should also mention that:
>
> > This changes behavior when slot_name is altered together with SET
> > (two_phase = true) on an ENABLED subscription. Previously the state was
> > reset to PENDING and the apply worker enabled two_phase on the replacement
> > slot. Now the state stays ENABLED and the apply worker does not touch the
> > replacement slot's two_phase property.
>
> > It's in the commit message and was added to ensure it's in the release note,
> > see [1].
>
> Hmph. I read that and I was like "so what?". Why would users need
> to know that? How likely is it that anyone would issue such a
> combined command in the first place?
>

I agree that it is less likely for users to use such a combination and
even if they use I don't think it is a big deal. We can leave
mentioning anything about such a combination.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.