| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |
| Date: | 2026-11-09 05:41:50 |
| Message-ID: | 2159853.1794202910@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2026 at 9:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hmph. I read that and I was like "so what?". Why would users need
>> to know that? How likely is it that anyone would issue such a
>> combined command in the first place?
> I agree that it is less likely for users to use such a combination and
> even if they use I don't think it is a big deal. We can leave
> mentioning anything about such a combination.
To be clear, that was an honest request for information. I don't
understand why this point is worth space in the release notes.
But if you think it is, educate me. We still have a little time
to adjust the notes ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2026-11-09 05:43:01 | [PATCH] Account for failed recovery prefetch advice |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-11-09 05:37:42 | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |