Re: Hash Indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-12-12 04:37:48
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+GcupkrFhSDDWwb_+qkcGRF6xT5ZYN9tkN4O5tuqPVzw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> With above fixes, the test ran successfully for more than a day.
>

There was a small typo in the previous patch which is fixed in
attached. I don't think it will impact the test results if you have
already started the test with the previous patch, but if not, then it
is better to test with attached.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_hashindex_issues_v2.patch application/octet-stream 9.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2016-12-12 04:41:08 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing and Tuple Deforming (including JIT)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-12-12 04:09:16 Re: jsonb problematic operators