Re: Hash Indexes

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-12-13 13:53:33
Message-ID: 25b3631c-ae24-dbdd-cbca-a3f8bd31eceb@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/11/2016 11:37 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> With above fixes, the test ran successfully for more than a day.
>>
> There was a small typo in the previous patch which is fixed in
> attached. I don't think it will impact the test results if you have
> already started the test with the previous patch, but if not, then it
> is better to test with attached.
>

A mix work load (INSERT, DELETE and VACUUM primarily) is successful here
too using _v2.

Thanks !

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-12-13 14:13:44 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-13 13:43:22 Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)