Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2023-08-09 04:44:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+CiQzHLWHrP4r4RJUrChMLrh4kvg96=SaVA-oqXNQMQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:20 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 6:52 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 1:50 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch added the following error message:
> > >
> > > errdetail_plural("Subscribed publication %s is subscribing to other
> > > publications.",
> > > "Subscribed publications %s are subscribing to other publications.",
> > > list_length(publist), pubnames->data),
> > >
> > > But in PostgreSQL, a publication cannot subscribe to a publication, so
> > > this is not giving accurate information. Apparently, what it is trying
> > > to say is that
> > >
> > > The subscription that you are creating subscribes to publications that
> > > contain tables that are written to by other subscriptions.
> > >
> > > Can we get to a more accurate wording like this?
> > >
> >
> > +1 for changing the message as per your suggestion.
> >
>
> PSA a patch to change this message text. The message now has wording
> similar to the suggestion.
>
> > > There is also a translatability issue there, in the way the publication
> > > list is pasted into the message.
> > >
>
> The name/list substitution is now done within parentheses, which AFAIK
> will be enough to eliminate any translation ambiguities.
>

A similar instance as below uses \"%s\" instead. So, isn't using the
same a better idea?
errdetail_plural("LDAP search for filter \"%s\" on server \"%s\"
returned %d entry.",
"LDAP search for filter \"%s\" on server \"%s\" returned %d entries.",

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-09 04:53:23 Re: pg_upgrade fails with in-place tablespace
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-08-09 04:41:58 Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning