Re: Logging parallel worker draught

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date: 2023-04-22 11:06:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+2_te1KYFkSoagdK4Okj0Ob_17KmMGf=qdZ0H4Muzjcw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 6:34 PM Benoit Lobréau
<benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Following my previous mail about adding stats on parallelism[1], this
> patch introduces the log_parallel_worker_draught parameter, which
> controls whether a log message is produced when a backend attempts to
> spawn a parallel worker but fails due to insufficient worker slots.
>

I don't think introducing a GUC for this is a good idea. We can
directly output this message in the server log either at LOG or DEBUG1
level.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-04-22 11:42:36 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-04-22 10:29:38 Re: The order of queues in row lock is changed (not FIFO)