Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock

From: Neil Chen <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Rocker <me(at)kevinrocker(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock
Date: 2026-08-05 01:04:58
Message-ID: CAA3qoJ=X0bESmUku4uL7Q=vnW-GPrajc2kfSWv+hKbJxweab5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Kevin and Andery,

My second patch was intended as an experiment, with the assertions also
serving as instrumentation while testing the hash relocation. Following
your suggestion, I ran the Meson equivalent of check-world and checked the
logs with Sol; there were no assertion failures. Still, I agree that the
assertions are too strong to keep permanently.

I am happy to leave hash aside for now, and the current patch looks good to
me. I also agree that a backpatch does not seem necessary here.

Best regards,

--
Ze Chen (Neil)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2026-08-05 01:18:21 Re: Prove a NOT IN's left-hand expressions non-nullable from quals
Previous Message Mark Atwood 2026-08-05 00:48:05 [PATCH v1 3/3] Fetch the channel binding digest explicitly with OpenSSL 3.0 and later