| From: | "Kevin Rocker" <me(at)kevinrocker(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrey Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, "Neil Chen" <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers mailing list" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock |
| Date: | 2026-08-04 14:09:30 |
| Message-ID: | ff0b000e-41e6-44e2-a2c9-5d4b4aed02e3@app.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrey's extension makes sense to me, happy to make a combined patch.
If there are other places where this happens, we can either go one patch at a time or try to do it all together. I'm leaning towards one patch at a time. My only remaining question is if we need to backpatch this.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/178447127453.110.12276981925360691905%40mail.gmail.com also adjusted vacuum_delay_point calls and was backpatched back to 14. That might not be necessary in our case, but I want to ask.
- Kevin Rocker
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2026-08-04 14:32:46 | Re: convert various variables to atomics |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-08-04 14:07:58 | Re: convert various variables to atomics |