From: | Pete Lancashire <pete(at)petelancashire(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13498: make check failures |
Date: | 2015-07-13 21:49:36 |
Message-ID: | CAA-F0u90GEzRvSdE65iZ6yZ9eNOhLFfertgaETwj47Nw=ABDFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I dont at this time have GCC installed. The goal was to be able to take
advantage of optimization that understood the actual hardware
by setting -qarch=pwr7 -qtune=pwr7 the xlc compiler starting at -O3 up to
-O5 make optimization decisions that are unique to the hardware, in this
case the p7 architecture,
O4 and O5 then take it quite a but more, O5 can take what compiles in a a
few second to more then 10 minutes.
It is pretty rare that -O3 used with -strict will break anything, actually
this is the first time I've seen it happen.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2015-07-13 14:15:58 -0700, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> > I'll agree to a point.
> >
> > I'll see what else I can find out. Is there an option to make the test
> more
> > verbose ? And I'll see what I can get out of the what changes the
> > optimization does
> >
> > Its a pitty, I'd love to get postgresql screaming on a P-series. In other
> > things level 3 can increase the performance 20-30% and level 5 in one
> > program that does a lot of array searching 50-70%
>
> You could try with gcc -O3...
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-07-14 07:29:13 | Re: BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-13 21:20:06 | Re: BUG #13498: make check failures |