Re: BUG #13498: make check failures

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Pete Lancashire <pete(at)petelancashire(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #13498: make check failures
Date: 2015-07-13 21:20:06
Message-ID: 20150713212006.GE25610@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2015-07-13 14:15:58 -0700, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> I'll agree to a point.
>
> I'll see what else I can find out. Is there an option to make the test more
> verbose ? And I'll see what I can get out of the what changes the
> optimization does
>
> Its a pitty, I'd love to get postgresql screaming on a P-series. In other
> things level 3 can increase the performance 20-30% and level 5 in one
> program that does a lot of array searching 50-70%

You could try with gcc -O3...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pete Lancashire 2015-07-13 21:49:36 Re: BUG #13498: make check failures
Previous Message Pete Lancashire 2015-07-13 21:15:58 Re: BUG #13498: make check failures