Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays

From: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays
Date: 2022-07-26 01:50:07
Message-ID: CA348268-184A-431D-8F89-53D76B44CE91@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jul 26, 2022, at 03:04, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
> From the discussion thus far, it seems there is interest in optimizing
> [sub]xip lookups, so I'd like to spend some time moving it forward. I
> think the biggest open question is which approach to take. Both the SIMD
> and hash table approaches seem viable, but I think I prefer the SIMD
> approach at the moment (see the last paragraph of quoted text for the
> reasons). What do folks think?
>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>
>

+1, I’m not familiar with SIMD, will try to review this patch.

Regards,
Zhang Mingli

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-26 01:58:14 Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-26 01:47:12 Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE