Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date: 2011-08-04 12:57:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

Oh, I see.  Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in.  The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2011-08-04 13:07:37
Subject: plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https
Previous:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2011-08-04 12:44:35
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group