Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Date: 2017-09-01 19:19:24
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa5oKefW27VXD=mLRo0_SbbFj=Scybc-MZist7X3EkNmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
<jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001:
> This patch refactors RelationBuildPartitionDesc(), basically this is patch
> 0001 of default range partition[1].

I spent a while studying this; it seems to be simpler and there's no
real downside. So, committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-01 19:46:21 Re: memory fields from getrusage()
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-09-01 19:12:03 Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join