Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2012-01-17 01:37:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 18:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?
>>> IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.
>> It used to be in heapam.h ... evidently, whoever moved it missed this
>> comment.
> I imagined that that was the case.
> It's a fairly inconsequential bug, but it is worth fixing...


Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-17 01:54:53
Subject: Re: fatal flex error in guc-file.l kills the postmaster
Previous:From: yamtDate: 2012-01-16 09:32:24
Subject: BUG #6399: knngist sometimes returns tuples in incorrect order

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group