| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 |
| Date: | 2018-11-30 15:34:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcXvVj-n-_+f3j+k_mnffAhw9gieNPfaoOKtKsgsBqQtwg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:17 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I haven't really planned to work on this anytime soon, unfortunately,
> which is why I proposed to mark it as RwF at the end of the last CF. I
> already have a couple other patches there, and (more importantly) I
> don't have a very clear idea how to implement the filter pushdown.
>
> That being said I still think it'd be an interesting improvement, and if
> someone wants to take over I'm available as a reviewer / tester ...
Since no one expressed any particular desire to take over the patch, I'm
marking it as "Returned with feedback". Although I really like the discussion
that happened here, maybe it worth to move a part of it to the wiki under the
"possible improvements" flag?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2018-11-30 15:44:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-30 15:32:44 | Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe? |