Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Юрий Соколов <funny(dot)falcon(at)gmail(dot)com>, y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Date: 2018-11-30 15:44:37
Message-ID: CA+q6zcV3RUDDL9_8AgWhEzB8z5YPq7pHH=tQxsPMyJ4kLXhKuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:19 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The idea of this patch seems reasonable.
>
> I've looked at this patch. This patch still can be applied cleanly to
> the current HEAD and passed regression tests.
>
> Here is review comments.

Thanks for the review. Just for the records, patch still has no conflicts and
pass all the tests. Yura, do you have any plans about this patch, could you
respond to the feedback? In the meantime I'm moving it to the next CF.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= 2018-11-30 15:44:38 Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-30 15:34:56 Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2