| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Date: | 2019-01-15 06:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcWKMVop9DBd=cui+sPLMSqfVZyh+GrF=s-5G9rzW90FXA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> createPQExpBuffer() should be moved after the below statement, so that
> it does not leak memory
Thanks for noticing, fixed.
> So how about bumping up the archive version and doing these checks ?
Yeah, you're right, I've added this check.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_dump_access_method_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 27.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-01-15 06:59:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-01-15 06:31:24 | Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds |