| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, greg(at)burd(dot)me |
| Subject: | Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64 |
| Date: | 2025-11-08 00:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLuNvLxdiwGQYjTWzh0W3JQoqegmOa9eOgpAPNDr-M+mg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 1:03 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> You're a brave man to be pushing this into the last-ever release
> of v13 with all of 12 hours remaining till code freeze. I don't
> mind so much for the newer branches, but I'm feeling nervous
> about the risk/reward ratio for v13.
I figured "adding a no-op compiler barrier where we already believed
there to be a compiler barrier and rely on it crucially" was pretty
safe as these things go, but that's a good point about v13 and I can
revert it in that one branch in a couple of hours if that's the
consensus.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-11-08 00:14:58 | Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-11-08 00:10:58 | Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64 |