Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Date: 2022-09-28 10:35:16
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLqmtLKR-rq5z-0gOiMzMPTibFa3XS6GphvvXxkrjaaJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:26 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It was a silly mistake, I used the F_OIDEQ function instead of
> F_INT8EQ. Although this was correct on the 0003 patch where we have
> removed the tablespace from key, but got missed in this :(
>
> I have locally reproduced this in a 32 bit machine consistently and
> the attached patch is fixing the issue for me.

I tested this with an armhf (32 bit) toolchain, and it passes
check-world, and was failing before.

Robert's patch isn't needed on this system. I didn't look into this
subject for long but it seems that SIGBUS on misaligned access (as
typically seen on eg SPARC) requires a 32 bit Linux/ARM kernel, but I
was testing with 32 bit processes and a 64 bit kernel. Apparently 32
bit Linux/ARM has a control /proc/cpu/alignment to select behaviour
(options include emulation, SIGBUS) but 64 bit kernels don't have it
and are happy with misaligned access.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Kalcher 2022-09-28 10:40:31 Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2022-09-28 10:25:12 Obsolete comment in ExecInsert()