Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Date: 2019-07-08 02:52:51
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLexXpEM0fXHjrQg8v_k1tq_7dJCrnVzfZXJFgbCEKcWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:58 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:15 AM Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > I think this definitely not bug fix. Bloom filter was designed to be
> > lossy, no way blaming it for that :)
>
> I will think about a simple fix, but after the upcoming point release.
> There is no hurry.

A bureaucratic question: What should the status be for this CF entry?

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hao Wu 2019-07-08 02:59:07 Add test case for sslinfo
Previous Message Ryan Lambert 2019-07-08 02:35:29 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option