Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2019-10-13 00:44:59
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLZh8_Js04nd1-z4_awZyTT-2nzHPxuztn1ApuTS_r=Ow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I don't think any further proof is required that this is
> a kernel bug. Where would be a good place to file it?

linuxppc-dev(at)lists(dot)ozlabs(dot)org might be the right place.

https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-13 01:26:10 CREATE TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY segfaulting on 9.6+
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-13 00:10:32 Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12