From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Date: | 2019-10-13 13:31:54 |
Message-ID: | 20191013133154.fyxrkcbf4zpwrmtt@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-10-13 13:44:59 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I don't think any further proof is required that this is
> > a kernel bug. Where would be a good place to file it?
>
> linuxppc-dev(at)lists(dot)ozlabs(dot)org might be the right place.
>
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Probably requires reproducing on a pretty recent kernel first, to have a
decent chance of being investigated...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-13 14:29:45 | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-10-13 13:03:21 | Re: v12.0: segfault in reindex CONCURRENTLY |