Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2019-10-13 13:31:54
Message-ID: 20191013133154.fyxrkcbf4zpwrmtt@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-10-13 13:44:59 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I don't think any further proof is required that this is
> > a kernel bug. Where would be a good place to file it?
>
> linuxppc-dev(at)lists(dot)ozlabs(dot)org might be the right place.
>
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Probably requires reproducing on a pretty recent kernel first, to have a
decent chance of being investigated...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-13 14:29:45 Re: stress test for parallel workers
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-10-13 13:03:21 Re: v12.0: segfault in reindex CONCURRENTLY