Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
Date: 2019-07-24 04:41:05
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLEwEx1TDjMtct_KE_h14XsfYAQAEiv2yREaXTRkCz2xQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:52 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess we should do that too. I don't know how to write Perl but I'll try...

Does this look about right?

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
wait-for-slapd.patch application/octet-stream 647 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-07-24 04:54:21 Re: pg_basebackup delays closing of stdout
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2019-07-24 04:30:27 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs