From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP |
Date: | 2019-07-24 05:26:22 |
Message-ID: | 20190724052622.GG14257@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:41:05PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:52 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I guess we should do that too. I don't know how to write Perl but I'll try...
>
> Does this look about right?
Some comments from here. I have not tested the patch.
I would recommend using TestLib::system_log instead of plain system().
The command should be a list of arguments with one element per
argument (see call of system_log in PostgresNode.pm for example). The
indentation is incorrect, and that I would make the retry longer as I
got the feeling that on slow machines we could still have issues. We
also usually tend to increase the timeout up to 5 minutes, and the
sleep phases make use of Time::HiRes::usleep.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-07-24 05:47:13 | Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-24 05:16:27 | Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place |