Re: Clean up hba.c of code freeing regexps

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clean up hba.c of code freeing regexps
Date: 2023-04-13 00:53:51
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLCO92vgPWV1d6XT11w9DWzjSRX2Y-aFbQpUnpmLCnzDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:16 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The logic in hba.c that scans all the HBA and ident lines to any
> regexps can be simplified a lot. Most of this code is new in 16~, so
> I think that it is worth cleaning up this stuff now rather than wait
> for 17 to open for business. Still, this is optional, and I don't
> mind waiting for 17 if the regexp/palloc business proves to be an
> issue during beta.

Up to the RMT of course, but it sounds a bit like (1) you potentially
had an open item already until last week (new code in 16 that could
leak regexes), and (2) I missed this when looking for manual memory
management code that could be nuked, probably because it's hiding
behind a few layers of functions call, but there are clearly comments
that are now wrong. So there are two different ways for a commitfest
lawyer to argue this should be tidied up for 16.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2023-04-13 00:53:53 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-13 00:37:06 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump