Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2019-07-09 12:16:49
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL9_ohxMBq04N8qwn-vEaaan2N-06FaXsTz9+seDddN3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:32 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Sorry, are you tests autoprepare-16.patch I have sent in the last e-mail?
> I can not reproduce the problem with building documentation:

+ <term><varname>autoprepare_threshold</varname> (<type>integer/type>)

The problem is that "<type>integer/type>". (Missing "<"). There more
than one of those. Not sure why that doesn't fail for you.

> Also autoporepare-16.patch doesn't include any junk
>
> src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat.~1~

Oops, yeah, sorry for the noise. I did something stupid in my apply script.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2019-07-09 12:23:57 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-07-09 12:11:25 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)