Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2019-07-09 20:59:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.07.2019 15:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:32 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Sorry, are you tests autoprepare-16.patch I have sent in the last e-mail?
>> I can not reproduce the problem with building documentation:
> + <term><varname>autoprepare_threshold</varname> (<type>integer/type>)
> The problem is that "<type>integer/type>". (Missing "<"). There more
> than one of those. Not sure why that doesn't fail for you.
> or the noise. I did something stupid in my apply script.

Sorry, there were really several syntax problems.
I didn't understand why I have not noticed them before.
Fixed patch version of the path is attached.

Attachment Content-Type Size
autoprepare-17.patch text/x-patch 93.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-09 21:06:45 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-09 20:51:46 Re: [PATCH] Fix trigger argument propagation to child partitions