Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-01-21 18:58:16
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL0xFzBXLPhta3bMkKQP1mL1LZMWBni-vzhmUcMe-qWqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. I added that and pushed. Let's see if fairywren likes it
> when it comes back online.

A watched pot never boils, but I wonder why Andrew's 4 Windows
configurations jacana, bowerbird, fairywren and drongo have stopped
returning results.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-01-21 19:04:06 Re: Document atthasmissing default optimization avoids verification table scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-01-21 18:57:18 Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)