Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files
Date: 2020-07-12 22:36:02
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKhTTWWPxXdkZqKQk0HPeRASFBSotSiYc4Anf_AXCk8Yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:13 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here the numbers with the updated patch:
> >
> > HEAD patched (v2)
> > foo5 8.5 6.1
> > foo10 14 9.4
> > foo20 25 16.7
> >
>
> Patch applies cleanly, make check & make check-world passes.

This error showed up when cfbot tried it:

COPY BINARY stud_emp FROM
'/home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/stud_emp.data';
+ERROR: could not read from COPY file: Bad address

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-07-12 23:58:54 Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes
Previous Message Floris Van Nee 2020-07-12 22:18:26 RE: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)