Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Date: 2020-08-12 00:24:52
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKdey77=asfyBd+-Hnmz6Y_R+TZ+wtogaTppEdVTCH+rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2020-07-29 19:20:04 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:15 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > +static inline FullTransactionId
> > > +FullXidViaRelative(FullTransactionId rel, TransactionId xid)
> > >
> > > I'm struggling to find a better word for this than "relative".
> >
> > The best I've got is "anchor" xid. It is an xid that is known to
> > limit nextFullXid's range while the receiving function runs.
>
> Thinking about it, I think that relative is a good descriptor. It's just
> that 'via' is weird. How about: FullXidRelativeTo?

WFM.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-08-12 01:30:31 Re: Can I test Extended Query in core test framework
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-08-12 00:19:52 Re: [BUG] Error in BRIN summarization