Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout
Date: 2021-02-05 04:47:16
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKH=XNPTiyVsCh1HV2qN3XrT96nXcKwUcyUWFFhRoiiew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 6:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > So that gives a very simple back-patchable patch.
>
> Hmm, so is the *rest* of that function perfectly okay with being
> interrupted?

It looks OK to me. There aren't any CFI()s in there.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hou, Zhijie 2021-02-05 04:51:19 RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-02-05 04:45:34 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)