Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout
Date: 2021-01-31 05:07:01
Message-ID: 3054076.1612069621@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> +1, this seems like a good idea. This is a little bit like the code
>> near the comments "Don't joggle the elbow of proc_exit".

> So that gives a very simple back-patchable patch.

Hmm, so is the *rest* of that function perfectly okay with being
interrupted?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-01-31 05:54:30 Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-01-31 01:39:10 Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby