| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? |
| Date: | 2026-04-08 05:51:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK8TB0VisxG7BDBM=aTVkxw1qdag4P7Mv5Sg2e431=T7Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 5:32 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Here's what I came up with for pg_upgrade. It tests each database's
> > encodings with PG_VALID_BE_ENCODING(), and looks like this when it
> > fails:
> > ...
> > I'll wait a bit longer for this one, on the off chance of reviews at
> > this late hour.
>
> Passes a quick eyeball check, anyway.
Thanks! And pushed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2026-04-08 06:04:45 | Re: Logical Replication - revisit `is_table_publication` function implementation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-04-08 05:32:15 | Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? |