Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Date: 2026-04-08 05:32:15
Message-ID: 3000229.1775626335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here's what I came up with for pg_upgrade. It tests each database's
> encodings with PG_VALID_BE_ENCODING(), and looks like this when it
> fails:
> ...
> I'll wait a bit longer for this one, on the off chance of reviews at
> this late hour.

Passes a quick eyeball check, anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2026-04-08 05:51:03 Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Previous Message Haibo Yan 2026-04-08 05:31:39 [PATCH] DISTINCT in plain aggregate window functions