Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Date: 2020-04-02 03:21:34
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJEnDbJ2m9+Aw3GUMoAw0E9gvWHmU1QHTFt=7wBOyVyLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:14 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> * updated OIDs to avoid collisions
> * added btequalimage to btree/xid8_ops

Here's the version I'm planning to commit tomorrow, if no one objects. Changes:

* txid.c renamed to xid8funcs.c
* remaining traces of "txid" replaced various internal identifiers
* s/backwards compatible/backward compatible/ in funcs.sgml (en_GB -> en_US)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to-.patch text/x-patch 26.6 KB
v8-0002-Introduce-xid8_XXX-functions-to-replace-txid_XXX.patch text/x-patch 61.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2020-04-02 03:34:31 Re: Add A Glossary
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-02 03:13:12 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)