Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date: 2019-07-01 10:21:46
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJ921L3q+sFkEqO2_YRpSpCPqvs=J3Wz41absZn0ayuaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 12:52 AM Ildus Kurbangaliev
<i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> in my opinion this patch is usually skipped not because it is not
> needed, but because of its size. It is not hard to maintain it until
> commiters will have time for it or I will get actual response that
> nobody is going to commit it.

Hi Ildus,

To maximise the chances of more review in the new Commitfest that is
about to begin, could you please send a fresh rebase? This doesn't
apply anymore.

Thanks,

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-07-01 10:30:28 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2019-07-01 10:09:38 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority