Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date: 2026-01-06 00:21:25
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+gBqKRAj8pX+CuQSM8yVc76+NrqQRRrmegzqU0LxpOKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 12:56 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 12:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > https://github.com/sabotage-linux/gettext-tiny/issues/76
>
> Problem ack'd. It looks like they want to fix it. Fingers crossed.

FYI this has been fixed and our test passes with their msgfmt compiled
from source, so it could be reenabled on those animals once that has
flowed into the right places. No idea when that'll be though.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Niyaz Hazigaleyev 2026-01-06 00:33:14 Re: Use Postgres as meson wrap subproject
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-01-06 00:11:28 Re: Row pattern recognition