| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) |
| Date: | 2025-12-17 23:56:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK6ULHPnUPu=f5_FUkv8dkjgZ3=S-XYB-P8O=DLr3T4VQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 12:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else.
>
> Hah, I had predicted that three would work. Off by one.
>
> > What to do now? I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but
> > I sure don't want to. A stopgap measure to make the farm look
> > green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts
> > this output, but yech. Thoughts?
>
> So close yet so far... I tried asking if it's easy to fix:
>
> https://github.com/sabotage-linux/gettext-tiny/issues/76
Problem ack'd. It looks like they want to fix it. Fingers crossed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-12-17 23:58:10 | Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2025-12-17 23:52:57 | Re: Custom oauth validator options |